[ENet-discuss] ENet 2.0 most wanted features?

[Jay Sprenkle]

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:19 AM, progmars <progmars at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would like Enet to focus on extensibility and versatility.
>
> Obviously, many of the requested features (streaming, NAT punchthrough,
> packet loss and network lag simulation) do not belong to the Enet core, but
> instead we could ask the question: does Enet provide everything to
> implement all of those features in a clean way? If not, then Enet should be
> modified to provide more extension points and necessary infrastructure to
> support most of the typical usage scenarios mentioned in this thread.
>
>
That was my thought too. I implemented NAT hole punch by calling the low
level functions used in enet. They weren't exposed by default so I had to
customize my version.



-- 
*http://xkcd.com/1156/*
*
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cubik.org/pipermail/enet-discuss/attachments/20130501/df22c2f9/attachment.html>