[phobos] next release

[Lars Tandle Kyllingstad]

In principle I agree that this would be the tidiest solution. But considering the size of the date/time modules that have been proposed (and those aren't even complete yet), I fear std.datetime will be huge.

How about keeping std.date and introducing std.time?

Anyway, if there is agreement on a solution, I can take care of moving stuff around tomorrow - tonight for most of you, that is - if nobody beats me to it.

-Lars

----- Reply message -----
From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrei at erdani.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 9, 2010 16:08
Subject: [phobos] next release
To: "Discuss the phobos library for D" <phobos at puremagic.com>

On 9/9/10 8:20 CDT, Lars Tandle Kyllingstad wrote:
> I think we should make some kind of decision regarding the date/time
> module(s) before releasing a Phobos version that contains std.stopwatch.
>
> It would be silly to introduce a new module, only to deprecate it and
> move Stopwatch into std.time (or whatever) in the following release...

Oh, I forgot that hasn't been resolved. Let's do this:

1. deprecate std.perf

2. Define std.datetime, paste std.stopwatch in it, and have it import 
std.date for now

3. Put a reminding comment in std.date that it'll be deprecated in favor 
of std.datetime

Does someone have the time to do so today?


Andrei
_______________________________________________
phobos mailing list
phobos at puremagic.com
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20100909/693ca105/attachment.html>