[phobos] Time to get ready for the next release

[David Simcha]

Right.  This discussion is about what those pull requests should actually do
and why.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Michel Fortin <michel.fortin at michelf.com>wrote:

> Le 2011-04-21 à 16:16, David Simcha a écrit :
>
> > This is about the 16 billionth time someone has suggested "with" as a
> > solution, and every time I am forced to point out yet again that with()
> > doesn't cut it.
>
> I already regret suggesting "with" because this is not what this thread is
> about.
>
> My original question is about whether I should make a pull request for the
> 5 commits that bring @property enforcement as an experimental feature, or
> whether I should extract the two commits that fix auto return problems and
> make a separate pull request for them (which is a little more work for me).
>
> And also, per the thread's title, it's about whether any of that should be
> part of the next release or not.
>
> Whether the -property switch enforces things correctly or not can be
> decided and changed later.
>
> --
> Michel Fortin
> michel.fortin at michelf.com
> http://michelf.com/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/phobos/attachments/20110421/f8bdfbc2/attachment.html>