[phobos] Decision on length of deprecation cycle

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

That's a nice simple idea, but it's a bit difficult to appreciate that a 
change effected somewhere in late June immediately gets enacted in a 
matter of days.

Andrei

On 5/25/11 2:59 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> What if the choice was made that July 4th and January 1st where the
> days when 2->3 and 1->2 happens. This means we don't track when
> something was added to what, we just have a predictable schedule.
> Exceptions could be made for those that must be removed for updates to
> be made, and maybe that can be on a compiler release basis.
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis<jmdavisProg at gmx.com>  wrote:
>> The deprecation cycle has three phases:
>>
>> 1. Scheduled for deprecation
>> 2. Deprecated
>> 3. Removed
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos