[phobos] Decision on length of deprecation cycle

[Simen Kjaeraas]

On Wed, 25 May 2011 22:12:37 +0200, Andrei Alexandrescu  
<andrei at erdani.com> wrote:

So add a rule for minimum number of days?

> That's a nice simple idea, but it's a bit difficult to appreciate that a  
> change effected somewhere in late June immediately gets enacted in a  
> matter of days.
>
> Andrei
>
> On 5/25/11 2:59 PM, Jesse Phillips wrote:
>> What if the choice was made that July 4th and January 1st where the
>> days when 2->3 and 1->2 happens. This means we don't track when
>> something was added to what, we just have a predictable schedule.
>> Exceptions could be made for those that must be removed for updates to
>> be made, and maybe that can be on a compiler release basis.
>>
>> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Jonathan M Davis<jmdavisProg at gmx.com>   
>> wrote:
>>> The deprecation cycle has three phases:
>>>
>>> 1. Scheduled for deprecation
>>> 2. Deprecated
>>> 3. Removed
>> _______________________________________________
>> phobos mailing list
>> phobos at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos


-- 
   Simen