Beta D 2.071.2-b3

[Rory McGuire via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 02 Sep 2016 07:40, "ketmar via Digitalmars-d-announce" <
digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 30 August 2016 at 23:54:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>>
>> Allowing access to private members has a lot of implications, e.g.
breaks lots of optimizations b/c you can't know who accesses sth.
>
>
> i really HATE modern trend of turning tables. am i the only one who
thinks that the machine was designed to serve the human, not vice versa?
yet somehow we all trying to make our machines happy now, instead of using
'em.
>
> the most funny thing with it is that modern software is bloated, dog
slow, resource hungry and barely usable. so all this "please the machine"
movement is completely pointless!

Perhaps @system code should just completely ignore privacy? Could have a
compiler option that changes the access errors into warnings?

Then make a separate tool that we can use to do assertions on that code.
For example or company could have a policy that any @system code has 100%
test coverage.

Just thinking it loud.

R
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-announce/attachments/20160902/e672961f/attachment.html>