dud: A dub replacement

Russel Winder russel at winder.org.uk
Mon Nov 18 10:44:18 UTC 2019

On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 09:53 +0000, Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d-announce 
> A win-win move would be to have dud emit the other formats 
> automatically as part of the compilation procedure, so to have 
> always all of them present and synced on the content.

Why? In fact, why even think of doing this at all?

There should be one and only one human written configuration file for a build
and it should be in a notation suitable for being written by humans.

> It shouldn't be too much difficult, and maybe it's a cleaver way 
> to move on from discussions about different formats.

Again why? It seems like a pointless overhead that achieves nothing

Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-announce/attachments/20191118/9d1a3916/attachment.sig>

More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list