d1.0blocker - anyone at home?

[Juan Jose Comellas]

Stewart Gordon wrote:

> There have been a number of independent attempts to round up what is
> needed before we are ready for 1.0:
> 
> - pending peeves
> - various posts on the 'groups giving opinions on the criteria
> - various posts on the 'groups criticising the amount of pretence that
> 1.0 is around the corner
> - most recently, the d1.0blocker flag in Bugzilla.
> 
> However, it seems that nobody else, not even Walter, has caught on to
> the fact that we have d1.0blocker.  So far, I'm the only one who's
> nominated anything for d1.0blocker status.
> 
> We need more people to nominate 1.0 blockers - whether by nominating
> existing issues filed in Bugzilla or by filing new issues and nominating
> them.  Complier bugs that really need fixing, Phobos bugs that really
> need fixing, corners of the spec waiting to be implemented, errors in
> the spec, ambiguities in the spec, inconsistencies in the spec, bits of
> the spec that that don't make sense, whatever else you can think of.
> 
> Come on - let's get nominating!
> 
> Stewart.
> 

It looks like a special permission is needed to mark a bug as a d1.0blocker.
I just tried it and it failed for me.