d1.0blocker - anyone at home?

[Brad Roberts]

Kyle Furlong wrote:
> Juan Jose Comellas wrote:
>> Stewart Gordon wrote:
>>
>>> There have been a number of independent attempts to round up what is
>>> needed before we are ready for 1.0:
>>>
>>> - pending peeves
>>> - various posts on the 'groups giving opinions on the criteria
>>> - various posts on the 'groups criticising the amount of pretence that
>>> 1.0 is around the corner
>>> - most recently, the d1.0blocker flag in Bugzilla.
>>>
>>> However, it seems that nobody else, not even Walter, has caught on to
>>> the fact that we have d1.0blocker.  So far, I'm the only one who's
>>> nominated anything for d1.0blocker status.
>>>
>>> We need more people to nominate 1.0 blockers - whether by nominating
>>> existing issues filed in Bugzilla or by filing new issues and nominating
>>> them.  Complier bugs that really need fixing, Phobos bugs that really
>>> need fixing, corners of the spec waiting to be implemented, errors in
>>> the spec, ambiguities in the spec, inconsistencies in the spec, bits of
>>> the spec that that don't make sense, whatever else you can think of.
>>>
>>> Come on - let's get nominating!
>>>
>>> Stewart.
>>>
>>
>> It looks like a special permission is needed to mark a bug as a 
>> d1.0blocker.
>> I just tried it and it failed for me.
>>
> 
> Likewise.

http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/2006-July/006681.html

Are you trying to set the flag, or request it?