plan for swt 3.5

[BLS]

bobef schrieb:
> Frank Benoit Wrote:
> 
>> bobef schrieb:
>>> I don't why these plans reminds me of what I said once :)
>>>
>>> http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php?art_group=digitalmars.D.announce&article_id=11189
>>>
>>>
>>> All of the above quotes is already in HTMLayout/Sciter. Why am I
>>> bringing performance? Because HTMLayout is fast.
>>>
>>> P.S. I love DWT and respect your hard work on it, but this way of
>>> doing GUI is dying. This is just MHO, of course.
>> Hm, i don't know if its dying. Perhaps D, as a system programming
>> language, is also loosing ground in the big game. Managed code seems to
>> get more and more important.
>>
>> However, for me, i see D and DWT as important :)
>>
> 
> Me too. D is important because other system languages suck (compared to D :) and DWT is important for D, because it lacks good GUI otherwise.
> 
>> Bobef, once you wanted to port the HtmlLayout/Sciter to DWT. Are there news?
> 
> I don't know what you mean by porting it to DWT. I used it inside DWT with mixed success. It is usable inside DWT but I did't make enough effort because I was doing all my GUI work with HTMLayout and DWT is too heavy just to create a parent window for HTMLayout. Now I am doing something else - something like XUL using DWT and TiScript (the scripting engine of Sciter), but I don't have much time so it is going slowly. Otherwise it is working very well with almost automatic binding of DWT to TiScript. I don't know if I will be able to finish it but I will share it anyway when it becomes mature (or I'm totally unable to continue).
> 
> Regards

Porting HtmlLayout ...  What about Harmonia ? Is this project still alive ?
bjoern