Emacs or Vi? Why the answer is neither.

Cliff Hudson cliff.s.hudson at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 00:01:20 PDT 2011


Kagamin, if you are experiencing failures with Visual Studio, please enter a
Connect bug on it at http://connect.microsoft.com/.  I work on Visual Studio
and we definitely want to hear about any crashes you experience,
particularly if you have something that you can reproduce.  Also, Service
pack 1 for Visual Studio 2010 is available now (if you don't already have it
installed.)

Thanks.

- Cliff

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Kagamin <spam at here.lot> wrote:

> Bruno Medeiros Wrote:
>
> > It seems to be article season, and I'm on a bit of a punditry mood, so
> > here's a blog post I wrote recently:
> >
> >
> http://pureconcepture.blogspot.com/2011/05/emacs-or-vi-why-answer-is-neither.html
> >
> > It's not about D, but it's a software development issue that has popped
> > up several times here in the NG... :)
>
> Theoretically IDE is better but Visual Studio
> 1. Loads a solution 20 seconds.
> 2. Hits OutOfMemoryException regularly after which it can randomly crash or
> do funny things.
> 3. Can't run for longer than a day.
> 4. Can't work on more than one solution at a time. Combined with 1
> switching between solutions is pain in the ass.
>
> Text editors may have less features but they're not so annoying, they just
> work. Well, I agree, the net productivity of visual studio is still higher,
> but it's tricky to stay sane working with it.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-ide/attachments/20110728/12c2bff1/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d-ide mailing list