ESR on post-C landscape
Patrick Schluter
Patrick.Schluter at bbox.fr
Thu Nov 16 18:06:22 UTC 2017
On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 16:38:58 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grostad
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 14 November 2017 at 11:55:17 UTC, codephantom wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Well, in another thread he talked about the Tango split, so not
> sure where he is coming from.
>
>> [...]
>
> No, the starting point for C++ was that Simula is better for a
> specific kind of modelling than C.
>
>> [...]
>
> It is flawed... ESR got that right, not sure how anyone can
> disagree. The only thing C has going for it is that CPU designs
> have been adapted to C for decades. But that is changing. C no
> longer models the hardware in a reasonable manner.
>
Because of the flawed interpretation of UB by the compiler
writers, not because of a property of the language itself.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-learn
mailing list