Two "standard" libraries???

[Mike Streatfield]

Brad Anderson wrote:
> 
> When you see a post from Sean Kelly saying that both parties are working
> toward this very goal of consolidation, does that mean nothing?
> 
> I guess I appreciate the re-re-iteration of the point that "two is bad"
> by multiple posters, but give the parties involved some time.  It's been
> three weeks since their meeting at the conference.  Everyone came out of
> that room fairly optimistic and w/o daggers in their back (i.e. they
> *are* getting along and not ruining any mood).  Walter has a better
> appreciation of how much is actually in Tango, and the Tango folk were
> able to gather first-hand Walter's main points of concern.  So they got
> busy between then and now... no big deal.  I imagine Sean's pluggable
> runtime and gc talk did wonders, and Derek's post about giving ground is
> right on.  They will both have to do so.  So we sit here patiently, and
> in the end, we will get the best of both?  Sounds like a deal to me.
> 

Well, awesome then :)

- Mike