T[new]

[grauzone]

bearophile wrote:
>> 2. make arrays implementable on .net
> 
> I don't care of such thing. dotnet already has C# and C# is probably better than D, and it's similar anyway. So I don't think people will use D on dotnet. So even if creating a D for dotnet can be positive, I don't want D2 to change its design to allow a better implementation on dotnet.

I see two things a dotnet implementation of D could have over native D:
- better garbage collector (the D one barely does its job...)
- better interoperability (*hint* OMF *hint*)