D library projects : adopting Boost license

[Walter Bright]

Don wrote:
> I think the GNU stuff is a bit different, because the GPL is an 
> aggressive license -- the FSF intends to defend the license, taking 
> offenders to court. Legal battles are expected, and having a single 
> legal entity makes it easier to win the case.
> By contrast, the Boost license exists solely for the benefit of the 
> users, giving them a guarantee that court cases will _not_ occur.
> I think that throughout Boost all of the authors retain their original 
> copyright.


It's true that GPL has an agenda that is not always in its users' best 
interests. The Boost license does.