[OT] Re: Can D be cute? (Qt)
a at a.a
Sun May 9 00:23:09 PDT 2010
"Lutger" <lutger.blijdestijn at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hs5n6h$5k4$1 at digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> "Michel Fortin" <michel.fortin at michelf.com> wrote in message
>> news:hs4s7g$1tc4$1 at digitalmars.com...
>>> On 2010-05-08 18:34:02 -0400, retard <re at tard.com.invalid> said:
>>>> Sat, 08 May 2010 18:22:37 -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>>>>> Now that I find really surprising. On Windows, Chrome is one of the
>>>>> biggest offenders of "To hell with native look & feel!" that I've ever
>>>> Chrome, on the other hand, has consistent look & feel across all
>>>> platforms. I guess the style comes from their own google web os system.
>>>> It doesn't look bad in my opinion, e.g. compared to Java and Swing.
>>> I was mostly talking about the non-browser-window elements, such as the
>>> preferences and the about box or any other windows. I specifically
>>> the browser window because I understand they include a lot of custom
>>> controls which doesn't necessarily represent Qt or Cocoa fairly.
>> Ahh, I was including the browser window. Regarding the dialog/preference
>> The dialog *body* has a very native look & feel, and I think it probably
>> uses the native controls.
>> The title/frame/border looks identical to non-accelerated Aero...but I'm
>> XP. One hell of a blatant gaffe. (And even if I were on Win7, I would
>> definitely set the system to the "Classic" non-aero style anyway. There's
>> number of things I like better about it, aesthetics just being one
> you can right-click and select 'Use system title bar and borders'. Or are
> referring to the looks only?
That's not showing up for me.
More information about the Digitalmars-d