State of curl wrapper?

[Nick Sabalausky]

"Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.1107.1308711970.14074.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...
> Is the curl wrapper at about the point that we could look at doing a 
> formal
> review of it followed by voting for inclusion in Phobos, or does it need 
> more
> bake time? It's fine either way. I'd just like to know where it sits.
>
> If it's ready for review, then we can start a formal review process for 
> it. If
> not, then Andrei has a pull request which would create a std.benchmark 
> (though
> a good chunk of it is from std.datetime) which some of expressed the 
> desire to
> have formally reviewed rather than just reviewed on github. So, if the 
> curl
> wrapper isn't ready for review yet, then we can review that.
>
> So, is the curl wrapper about ready for formal review, or does it need 
> more
> bake time first?
>

Or if not, what about the new std.path? I've been looking forward to that. 
'Course, curl would certainly be good too (and probably more important).