State of std.json?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 6/26/11 12:54 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Well, AFAIK the only other thing which could be up for review at the moment is
> std.benchmark, which arguably doesn't even need a review, which is quite small
> (something like half of it coming from std.datetime) and is definitely less
> important than getting a pre-existing module revamped such as std.json. So, if
> you're nearly ready to have the variant stuff reviewed, then I think that we
> should go for it. If not, then we can look at std.benchmark first.

Since std.benchmark got promoted from small additions to full-fledged 
module, it needs a few improvements before the formal review. The most 
important is output in machine readable form such that you can see 
"before" and "after" comparisons.

I'm also thinking of a complementary tools/ script that fetches two 
given releases of Phobos (or the latest and the head), compares them, 
and outputs the deltas.

Unfortunately, I'm very busy for the time being and I don't see getting 
to this until at least two weeks from now.


Thanks,

Andrei