Proposal for std.path replacement

[spir]

On 03/07/2011 01:44 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> I think whatever you choose will not please everybody, so just choose
>> >  something and stick with it. Regarding all the extension naming stuff, I
>> >  suggest you go with the "suffix" nomenclature which is more general and
>> >  applicable to all OSs.
> I agree with Lars on this one. Everyone knows what an extension is. It's a
> universal concept even if it's not used as much on non-Windows OSes. There _are_
> plenty of programs in *nix which use it internally (likely because it's a lot
> easier than dealing with mime type) even if they shouldn't.

eg: numerous compilers, programming editors,... ;-)

Denis
-- 
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com