Moving towards D2 2.061 (and D1 1.076)

[Walter Bright]

On 12/10/2012 8:01 PM, Kapps wrote:
> Right now, holding it off won't break any code not relying on an unreleased
> version of the compiler. Releasing it, then having to make changes will break
> code though. There were plenty of discussions about UDA stuff that never really
> got fully resolved. For example, whether only specific types should be allowed
> to be used as annotations. These things should have been fully decided before
> UDA's were implemented, because otherwise we may end up with an inferior
> approach for the sake of not breaking code, or breaking code because a feature
> was not fully fleshed out before being released.

I agree there was not a consensus reached on this issue. But I also feel all the 
arguments were fairly represented, and it was time to make a decision.