Arbitrary abbreviations in phobos considered ridiculous

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-03-11 20:55, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Mobile sites have traditionally required less-fancy implementations, so it's
> not unreasonable to think that some sites would use their mobile version
> *as* their low-tech fallback version. That's becoming less and less true
> these days, of course. But looking at http://m.drdobbs.com/ I have a strong
> feeling that was originally created for things like AvantGo (ie, on PalmOS)
> which really were very limited: no JS, no nested tables, very low
> resolution, often not even any color, very low memory, etc. Not that
> anything about what they're doing really makes a whole lot of sense anyway,
> though.

Actually, on some sites I use the mobile version, on the desktop. Just 
because it's so much more clean and not as verbose.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg