D vs C++11

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Fri, 2 Nov 2012 18:47:22 -0400
Nick Sabalausky <SeeWebsiteToContactMe at semitwist.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:53:05 -0700
> Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 11/2/2012 2:33 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> > > I said the gap is getting thinner, not that is gone. It got
> > > foreach, some form of CTFE, static assert, lambda to mention a few
> > > new features.
> > 
> > 
> > No ranges. No purity. No immutability. No modules. No dynamic
> > closures. No mixins. Little CTFE. No slicing. No delegates. No
> > shared. No template symbolic arguments. No template string
> > arguments. No alias this.
> 
> No proper modules. No properties. Slow compilation. No reference
> semantics for classes. No scope guards. Little default initialization.
> Goofy ptr and func-ptr declaration syntax. Goofy rules about what
> is/isn't virtual. Lots of undefined behavior. Forward declarations.
> 
> Things I'm not entirely certain about:
> 
> No IFTI? No polysemous literals? No finally?
> 

And no underscores in numeric literals. It's a minor little thing, but
it's so very nice to have: No more carefully counting digits to make
sure you got it right. :)