What's missing from Phobos for Orbit (package manager)

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-14 13:20, Regan Heath wrote:

> Just a minor point from me.  I reckon the functionality you want can and
> should be built on top of std.getopt.
>
> As others have said you could either do this first and get it submitted
> to phobos, and then work on the other issues and getting Orbit itself in
> there.. or you can build this functionality into a module within Orbit
> and then work on getting that extracted as a separate module in phobos.
>
> The former delays ppl being able to use Orbit, the latter means more
> work down the line to refactor Orbit - tho hopefully this will just be
> an import declaration change, tho it may also include a slight API
> change if ppl are unhappy with the existing one.

Andrei said there's stuff he didn't want at all, like the "dstack" 
library. I don't know if he means in Phobos or in Orbit at all.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg