@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[Adam Wilson]

On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:06:47 -0800, Adam D. Ruppe  
<destructionator at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 21:53:27 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
>> Right, this conversation is about removing @property, which invalidates  
>> your argument by turning the data into a function, which is what we  
>> want to avoid.
>
> Yeah, that's why I'm against the OP proposal.

Hehe, so am I! :-)

>> Also you might want to run your examples before posting them.
>
> I did.... on my modified dmd where @property has a less stupid (but  
> still buggy) implementation. It works correctly there!

I see. I like it. :-)

-- 
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Project Coordinator
The Horizon Project
http://www.thehorizonproject.org/