@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[kenji hara]

We can delay the decision about "optional parentheses for normal functions".
It can be separated from "strict prohibition of optional parentheses for
property functions"

Kenji Hara


2013/1/25 Nick Sabalausky <SeeWebsiteToContactMe at semitwist.com>

> On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:52:05 +0100
> "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com> wrote:
> >
> > And we can (and should) implement @property in a way that deals with
> > properties properly regardless of what we do with parenless function
> > calls.
> >
>
> I should clarify that this is my view as well. I may be vocally opposed
> to optional-parens for function calls, but even I'll admit that *is* a
> much lesser issue than making sure @property stays and is implemented
> properly.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130125/de7db2eb/attachment.html>