C++ Binding Generator

Abdulhaq alynch4047 at gmail.com
Mon Feb 17 00:54:02 PST 2014


On Monday, 17 February 2014 at 01:16:44 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote:
> Le 17/02/2014 01:36, w0rp a écrit :
>> On Saturday, 15 February 2014 at 03:36:29 UTC, michaelc37 
>> wrote:
>> I'll try Qt5 later. The main reason I'm trying to get Qt4 
>> working at the
>> moment is that I have experience with Qt4, but not with Qt5, 
>> and from my
>> understanding a lot of the advantages of Qt5 come from QML, 
>> and I don't
>> quite understand yet how QML would tie together with a D API.
>
> If someone is interested by Qt mainly for QML, maybe the better 
> way is to help us on DQuick, cause it's really similar, but we 
> try to take advantages of D to do something more friendly.

 From my personal point of view my main interest is in the 
programmatic Qt constructions (ie. Core & Widget module, not QML) 
as that's my itch that needs scratching. I'm not applying any 
effort ATM into the QML side of Qt. I think that a native DQuick 
implementation would be great and would probably provide a very 
compelling alternative to a wrapped QML (if that ever gets done 
by anybody) so I hope you get lets of help from anyone interested 
in that side of things.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list