Review of std.signal

[ilya-stromberg]

On Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 18:02:15 UTC, Robert M. Münch 
wrote:
> Hi, not really a comment regarding the actual implementation 
> but I think that good debug support for signales & slots helps 
> a lot in using it. What do I mean with this:
>
> - a way to dump in a human readable form the run-time 
> connections. Which function / class / etc. is currently 
> attached to which signal?
> - automatic logging like a call-stack in a debugger to get an 
> idea when which signal is acted on
> - a way to get the order of activation for debugging to 
> identify unwanted side-effects
> - etc.
>
> Big signal & slot implementaitons can be hard to debug, this 
> should be as simple as possible.

Yes, it will be good to have.

Also, you can vote `yes with condition` and write your condition 
after it (I think this description is good). In this case Robert 
receives your vote only if he implement your condition. It looks 
like not so many people use signals, so any feedback are welcome.