Worrying attitudes to the branding of the D language

[Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d]

On 3 July 2014 12:40, Alix Pexton via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 03/07/2014 10:40 AM, Dicebot wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at 17:34:46 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, 2 July 2014 at 11:02:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>>>
>>>> We don't have any recognizable branding worth fighting for. I can't
>>>> even remember how current D logo looks like without checking the
>>>> website, it is just some image in the corner of the page. "Branding"
>>>> is something bigger than that.
>>>
>>>
>>> But you recognise it when you see it!
>>
>>
>> I recognize the updated one too. Actually I won't be able to tell the
>> difference unless looking at both at the same time.
>>
>> My point is that there is nothing very distinctive with current logo to
>> be that concerned. Anything with similarly styled "D" letter will be as
>> recognizable as current one.
>
>
> I agree!
>
> I started working on this little document last night while angry and tired,
> maybe it should find its way to the wiki.
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Sb4xnZUbzVRIicsfnxBFhTvRH4EOYq88wZexAuGcnaE/edit
>
>
> Its the last time I'm going to post any work related to D branding or logo
> design unless someone specifically asks me to.
>
> A...


You mispelt "Useage"

/spelling troll