Extend D's switch statement?

[rsw0x via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 9 July 2015 at 12:38:11 UTC, ketmar wrote:
> at least part of it was implemented by Kenji himsef, and then 
> blocked due to "this isn't a best solution, and if we'll adopt 
> it, we will not able to adopt an ideal solution when it will 
> come". so far, the ideal solution isn't here (and it's unlikely 
> to arrive), and non-ideal is rejected. double win!

I see this happen a lot, it's always what might be instead of 
what actually exists and someone was willing to produce.