A few notes on choosing between Go and D for a quick project

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 3/14/2015 8:41 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 23:47:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 3/14/2015 3:19 PM, deadalnix wrote:
>>> On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 19:48:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>>>> The point is, with a library abstraction the core language can be simplified.
>>>> D's ability to create user defined literals largely ends the pressure to make
>>>> more complicated and specialized core language literals.
>>> It makes it sounds like you don't know the spec about string literals.
>>
>> I know I don't know what you're driving at :-)
>
> That we have a large number of string literals, in the core of the language,
> many of which could probably be language construct.

I haven't looked into it - anything in particular you have in mind?

I'd also prefer to get rid of /+ +/ comments, I thought they'd be more useful 
than they are.