What's happening with the `in` storage class

[Walter Bright]

On 6/8/2018 10:04 PM, Mike Franklin wrote:
> On Saturday, 9 June 2018 at 05:00:29 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> 
>> My goal in the short term is that Phobos is going to compile successfully with 
>> dip1000 the way it is now. It has already been deferred and deferred and 
>> deferred.
> 
> I understand that, and while you're doing that I can begin implementing the PRs 
> to deprecate `in` or change its definition to `scope const`, or something else.
> 
> Nothing I'm proposing will, in any way, interfere with what you're doing in 
> Phobos.  I just want a decision about what we're going to do with `in`.  I'll do 
> the leg work.

Your time is valuable, too, and while I'm not going to tell you want to work on, 
I'd prefer something more important.