DIP 1021--Argument Ownership and Function Calls--Final Review

[Walter Bright]

On 9/16/2019 11:23 AM, nkm1 wrote:
> The problem with this DIP is it a part of some bigger picture (which includes 
> DIP1000, DIP25 and probably other stuff) and it seems no one understands what 
> this bigger picture is.

The bigger picture is:

https://dlang.org/blog/2019/07/15/ownership-and-borrowing-in-d/

The smaller picture is that one cannot create a ref counted objected that can 
safely expose a ref to its payload without this proposal.