DIP 1021--Argument Ownership and Function Calls--Final Review

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Wed Sep 18 11:18:30 UTC 2019

On 9/16/2019 11:23 AM, nkm1 wrote:
> The problem with this DIP is it a part of some bigger picture (which includes 
> DIP1000, DIP25 and probably other stuff) and it seems no one understands what 
> this bigger picture is.

The bigger picture is:


The smaller picture is that one cannot create a ref counted objected that can 
safely expose a ref to its payload without this proposal.

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list