New DIP Rules

[bachmeier]

On Thursday, 23 July 2020 at 07:43:57 UTC, Dominikus Dittes 
Scherkl wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 July 2020 at 16:07:44 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>> My major concern is that the DIP process will stop working if 
>> Walter keeps using it. A DIP needs to be detailed, questions 
>> need to be answered, and an honest attempt needs to be made to 
>> deal with feedback.
>
> But exactly this point is adressed by the new proposal:
> Walter won't write DIPs in the future, but some third person 
> instead.
> This person will write the DIP detailed, answers questions and 
> work in the given feedback. Walter and Attila then decides if 
> the result should go in or not.
> I like this approach.

I don't see that in the announcement. It says only

> but the author is ultimately responsible for the content, 
> including modifying the additional draft as they see fit, and 
> deciding which bits of community feedback to incorporate and 
> which to ignore throughout the DIP process.

The main reason others do those things with their DIPs is because 
they'll be quickly dismissed if they don't. This proposal doesn't 
add anything to the requirements for DIP authors.