`restricted` member variables

[forkit]

On Thursday, 23 June 2022 at 11:24:36 UTC, Dom Disc wrote:
>
> It was never "under the rug", as it popped up now and then by 
> newbies.
>
> If anything, you managed to change my opinion from "I don't 
> need it, but who cares" to "It would be a failure to add it".
> I would oppose any such DIP and hope Daniels branch won't make 
> it in the mainstream.
>
> "restricted" (or hidden/sees which I still think would be 
> better names) would be a different thing, as this provides 
> something new (preventing member functions from accessing 
> specific fields). And fixes to the invariant handling are of 
> course a good thing.

Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!