Why is D unpopular?
Ola Fosheim Grøstad
ola.fosheim.grostad at gmail.com
Sun May 1 19:02:41 UTC 2022
On Sunday, 1 May 2022 at 18:09:16 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> What has happened is the *style* of singing has changed to
> accommodate use of autotune. This becomes most apparent if you
> listen to a lot of singers in the 1970s vs today. Modern
> singers also, since they don't have to train to be on pitch,
> don't seem to train to develop a good tone, either. Their
> voices just don't have good tone compared to 70's singers.
It is true that there are styles inspired (or defined) by
pitch-correction, actually some singers are so nimble and pitch
perfect that people refuse to believe that they don't use pitch
correction! However, if you are talking doing minor adjustments
in post production you would be better off using spectral tools.
Auto-tune did not invent pitch correction, the author of the
software didn't discover something obvious as you claimed, it
might have been the first marketable successful product, but the
concept was there beforehand and was well known.
The basics for a phasevocoder isn't all that complex, you do an
FFT then you detect the peaks, then you move the peaks, adjust
the phases and do an inverse FFT. (If you shift far you have to
correct the peaks to avoid an effect that sounds like Mickey
Mouse). There are a couple challenges though, one is that
consonants and other complex transients get smeared, so you have
to fix that with some hack. You also have the issue of tracking
pitch correctly, which I believe is where Autotune cut costs by
doing pitch tracking by autocorrelation more cheaply. That is a
technical improvement, not a conceptual one.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list