[dmd-internals] regressions, criticals, and blockers

[Alex Rønne Petersen]

Yeah, that's really how I interpret 'blocker' too.

Regards,
Alex

On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 2:05 AM, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>wrote:

> On Friday, April 27, 2012 15:50:57 Walter Bright wrote:
> >
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_severity
> >
> =regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_severity=critical&bug_status=NEW&bug_st
> > atus=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
> >
> > 69 of 'em, this is what we should be trying to tamp down
>
> I would note that if "blocker" meant anything like it's name would
> indicate,
> we should _never_ do a release with any blockers still in bugzilla.
> Whether we
> really want to function that way or not, I don't know, but that would be
> what
> the term indicates, and that's _not_ how we've been functioning.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-internals mailing list
> dmd-internals at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-internals/attachments/20120428/f67da35c/attachment.html>