[phobos] phobos commit, revision 1564

[Brad Roberts]

Ok, and if you want to cheat, there's 5 bugs that are both regressions and 
have the patch keyword:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?keywords=patch&keywords_type=allwords&order=Importance&bug_severity=regression&query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=D



On Fri, 28 May 2010, Brad Roberts wrote:

> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 17:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com>
> Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
> To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
> Subject: Re: [phobos] phobos commit, revision 1564
> 
> Excellent.  And if I might suggest 2 more goals for the next release:
> 
>   1) close out at least 10 bugs that have patches
>   2) close out at least 5 bugs marked as regressions
> 
> to find #1:
> has a patch attached to the report (91 issues):
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?order=Importance&field0-0-0=attachments.ispatch&query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=1&product=D
> 
> has the patch keyword (113 issues):
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?keywords=patch&keywords_type=allwords&order=Importance&query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=D
> 
> to find #2 (34 issues):
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?order=Importance&bug_severity=regression&query_format=advanced&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&product=D
> 
> Hopeful,
> Brad
> 
> On Fri, 28 May 2010, Walter Bright wrote:
> 
> > Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 17:41:26 -0700
> > From: Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>
> > Reply-To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
> > To: Discuss the phobos library for D <phobos at puremagic.com>
> > Subject: Re: [phobos] phobos commit, revision 1564
> > 
> > Ok.
> > 
> > Brad Roberts wrote:
> > > I'll put 3516 on my list to look at this weekend.  1894 is on my list of
> > > 'make it die' as well.  Walter, wanna take that one and make it go away for
> > > us? :)
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the list,
> > > Brad
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 28 May 2010, Don Clugston wrote:
> > > 
> > >   
> > > > On 28 May 2010 20:34, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> > > >     
> > > > > Don, what's your top 5 list of unfixed bugs?
> > > > >       
> > > > After this one:
> > > > (A) Deterministic destruction does not work.
> > > > 3516  Destructor not called on temporaries
> > > > 3323 Segfault or ICE(e2ir.c) using struct with destructor almost anywhere
> > > > 1894 scope(exit) is ignored except in compound statements
> > > > 
> > > > (B)  Module protection does not work
> > > > 314 [module] Static, renamed, and selective imports are always public
> > > > 
> > > > (C) AAs don't work with structs
> > > > 2451 Adding structs that use opAssign or postblit to an AA is broken
> > > > 
> > > > Which is actually not too different to the list of most voted bugs.
> > > > These are the ones where I think someone could legitimately decide not
> > > > to use D based on the existence of that single bug. I used to have a
> > > > long list of such bugs (most involved wrong code generation), but
> > > > almost all of them have been fixed.
> > > > 
> > > >     
> > > > > From my personal wish list: I'd really love to see increased focus on
> > > > > patch integration.  There's a lot of them out there, many with authors
> > > > > who
> > > > > are eager to improve their patches if needed and just need the nudges.
> > > > > More attention to patches ==> more happy patch submitters ==> more
> > > > > submissions ==> faster bug fixing.
> > > > >       
> > > > I agree, and the original success of Linux has often been attributed to
> > > > that.
> > > > We might not be too far from the point where Walter spends most of his
> > > > time integrating patches...
> > > > And it'll be well worth thinking about what we can do to make that as
> > > > easy as possible.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > phobos mailing list
> > > > phobos at puremagic.com
> > > > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> > > > 
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > phobos mailing list
> > > > phobos at puremagic.com
> > > > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> > _______________________________________________
> > phobos mailing list
> > phobos at puremagic.com
> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> phobos mailing list
> phobos at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/phobos
>