The D Programming Language - Digitalmars-d-bugs

March 2010 Archives by thread

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Mon Mar 1 07:04:15 PST 2010
Ending: Wed Mar 31 18:44:52 PDT 2010
Messages: 489

• [Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3856] const arguments/instance attributes in conditions/invariants   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3866] New: anonymous delegate with default parameters cross-talks to another anonymous delegate   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3867] New: forward delcaration generates very stange bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3867] forward delcaration generates very stange bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3867] forward delcaration generates very stange bug   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3867] Complex bug with a forward referenced enum member via an alias, templates, tuples, and CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3867] pragma(msg) with a forward referenced enum member via an alias, templates, tuples, and CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3867] pragma(msg) with a forward referenced enum member via an alias, templates, tuples, and CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3867] pragma(msg) with a forward referenced enum member via an alias, templates, tuples, and CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3867] Regression(1.051): forward referenced enum member via an alias, templates, and is()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3867] Regression(1.051): forward referenced enum member via an alias, templates, and is()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3835] [CTFE] Fragile CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3835] [CTFE] Fragile CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3868] New: It would be nice to have a function which read a file lazily using a range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3869] New: Unreasonable error without line number: "recursive template expansion"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3869] Unreasonable error without line number: "recursive template expansion"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3869] Unreasonable error without line number: "recursive template expansion"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3869] Unreasonable error without line number: "recursive template expansion"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3869] Unreasonable error without line number: "recursive template expansion"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3861] std.array.put doesn't put--it takes.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3803] compiler segfaults   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3848] functions in std.file don't take symbolic links into account   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3870] New: Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=00403208   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3870] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=00403208   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3870] Unexpected OPTLINK Termination at EIP=00403208   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3871] New: std.algorithm.map should propagate its input range properties   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3872] New: std.algorithm.filter could become bidirectional if its input range is bidir   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3873] New: std.range.repeat should have popBack defined   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3874] New: std.range.stride assumes a bidirectional input range   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3875] New: std.range.hasLength does not work if .length is defined inside a static if   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3876] New: std.range.Take back/popBack methods don't work correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3877] New: std.range.chain do not manage infinite ranges correctly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3878] New: Arguments and attributes with the same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3878] Arguments and attributes with the same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3878] Arguments and attributes with the same name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3879] New: compile-time assertion error in mtype.c: foreach through associative array w/ templated-class as value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3879] compile-time assertion error in mtype.c: foreach through associative array w/ templated-class as value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3879] compile-time assertion error in mtype.c: foreach through associative array w/ templated-class as value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3879] compile-time assertion error in mtype.c: foreach through associative array w/ templated-class as value   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3694] Template this parameters don't work with operator overloads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3880] New: std.regex functions with const/immutable Regex object   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3881] New: Structs as template arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3881] Structs as template arguments   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3882] New: Unused result of pure functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3883] New: Line number and file name of Exception instantiation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3884] New: Segfault: typedef present when passing array in tuple argument to function template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3884] Segfault: typedef present when passing array in tuple argument to function template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3884] Segfault: defining a typedef with an invalid object.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3884] Segfault: defining a typedef with an invalid object.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3884] Segfault: defining a typedef with an invalid object.d   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3885] New: No multithread support for Windows DLL   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3885] No multithread support for Windows DLL   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3885] No multithread support for Windows DLL   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3885] No multithread support for Windows DLL   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3342] TLS on dynamically loaded DLLs fails on Windows earlier than Vista   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3886] New: Bad example of definition file for DLLs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3887] New: ddoc does not replicate @property to documentation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3888] New: Version of find() which returns the range _before_ what was found   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3889] New: Forbid null as representation of empty dynamic array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3835] [CTFE] Fragile CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2411] Reference Tuple Foreach   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3890] New: Bad writeln of a nested struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2883] array member call syntax fails when array is returned from "property" syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3891] New: core.Thread constructors don't accept shared delegates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3891] core.Thread constructors don't accept shared delegates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3792] Regression: "non-constant expression" for a template inside a struct using a struct initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3892] New: Built-in "set" type similar to associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3893] New: opOpAssign and opIndexOpAssign get wrong operator string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3893] opOpAssign and opIndexOpAssign get wrong operator string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3893] opOpAssign and opIndexOpAssign get wrong operator string   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3894] New: std.range.Stride!R requires R.front() and R.back() to return by reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3895] New: Appending a double[] to a float[] no longer works.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3895] Appending a double[] to a float[] no longer works.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3895] Appending a double[] to a float[] no longer works.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3896] New: Broken links   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3897] New: Sporadic incorrectness with builtin AAs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3897] Sporadic incorrectness with builtin AAs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3898] New: access violation with associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3898] access violation with associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3898] access violation with associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3898] access violation with associative arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1355] Can't declare struct with align attribute in a statement body.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3899] New: CTFE: poor error message for use of uninitialized variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3899] CTFE: poor error message for use of uninitialized variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3900] New: CTFE: Wrong return value for array.var assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3900] CTFE: Wrong return value for array.var assignment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3901] New: PATCH: Nested struct assignment for CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3901] PATCH: Nested struct assignment for CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3901] PATCH: Nested struct assignment for CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3901] PATCH: Nested struct assignment for CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3901] PATCH: Nested struct assignment for CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3694] Template this parameters don't work with operator overloads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3902] New: Definition of opCmp   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3903] New: Traits compiles as true for an array sum with wrong syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3904] New: Infer function type from an alias in a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3904] Infer function type from an alias in a template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3905] New: Wrong error message with wrong opBinary("in")   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3906] New: Undefined struct and union declarations are not documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3907] New: @ attributes not part of grammar   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3908] New: @ attributes not part of function grammar   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2321] spec on inline asm can be misunderstood   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2463] No line number in "statement is not reachable" warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2567] [patch] Option To Not Treat Warnings As Errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3029] Bug in array value mangling rule   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3306] bad function/delegate literal generated into header files   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3373] bad codeview debug info for long and ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3420] [PATCH] Allow string import of files using subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3450] incorrect result for is (typeof({ ... }())) inside a struct   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3500] super behaves differently with -inline   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3558] Optimizer bug results in false if condition being taken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3670] Declarator grammar rule is broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3710] Typo in allMembers description?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3736] corrupted struct returned by function with optimizations (-O)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3737] SEG-V at expression.c:6255 from bad opDispatch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3768] reapeted quotes in ddoc.html   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3769] Regression: Segfault(constfold.c) array literals and case statements   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3775] Segfault(cast.c): casting no-parameter template function using property syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3781] ICE(interpret.c): using no-argument C-style variadic function in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3803] compiler segfaults   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3840] Jump to: section in the docs should be sorted   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3792] Regression: "non-constant expression" for a template inside a struct using a struct initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3378] [tdpl] ++x should be an lvalue   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3453] Linking order affects proper execution (Mac OSX only)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3491] typeof( (string[string]).init)) == AssociativeArray!(string, string), doesn't implicitly convert to string[string].   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3582] core.stdc.ctype functions are not pure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3619] Thread crash on exit   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3637] Array append patch to prevent stomping and to enhance thread-local append performance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3644] Wrong UCHAR_MAX value in module core.stdc.limits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3689] Grammar does not allow const(int)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3692] ICE(mtype.c) with associative arrays when std.variant is imported   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3695] __EOF__ token not documented   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3697] StructTemplateDeclaration and others missing constraint in rule   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3763] std.stdio.readlnImpl absurdly inefficient and overflows stack   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3776] Wrong CHAR_MIN value in module core.stdc.limits   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3909] New: toDelegate handles only a tiny subset of function pointer types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3909] toDelegate handles only a tiny subset of function pointer types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3910] New: Explicit template instantiations for functions used as array properties?   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3911] New: Associative array in CTFE crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3911] Associative array in CTFE crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3911] Associative array in CTFE crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3792] Regression: "non-constant expression" for a template inside a struct using a struct initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1807] ENHANCEMENT: Let IFTI "see through" templates to simple aliases   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3912] New: pure static nested functions are not recognized as pure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3912] pure static nested functions are not recognized as pure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3912] pure static nested functions are not recognized as pure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3912] pure static nested functions are not recognized as pure   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3835] [CTFE] Fragile CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3835] [CTFE] Fragile CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3913] New: Bad error message with wrong enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3914] New: Struct as argument that fits in register has member accessed wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3914] Struct as argument that fits in register has member accessed wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3914] Struct as argument that fits in register has member accessed wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3914] Struct as argument that fits in register has member accessed wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3914] Struct as argument that fits in register has member accessed wrong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3915] New: typeid not getting type of offsetof standard property   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3916] New: opEquals for objects does not respect const   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3917] New: opEquals for Ojbect could be more efficient   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3581] "private" attribute breaks "override"   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3918] New: Parameter use before its use in an AndAnd expression with reals treats NaN as false   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3918] Parameter use before its use in an AndAnd expression with reals treats NaN as false   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3918] Parameter use before its use in an AndAnd expression with reals treats NaN as false   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3667] Regression(D2 only): broken out(result) in contracts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3919] New: Assertion failure: '0' on line 9944 in file 'expression.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3919] ICE(expression.c, 9944): * or / with typedef ireal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3919] ICE(expression.c, 9944): * or / with typedef ireal   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3920] New: Assertion failure: '0' on line 10018 in file 'expression.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3920] Assertion failure: '0' on line 10018 in file 'expression.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3920] Assertion failure: '0' on line 10018 in file 'expression.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3342] TLS on dynamically loaded DLLs fails on Windows earlier than Vista   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3342] TLS on dynamically loaded DLLs fails on Windows earlier than Vista   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2671] Circular imports and static constructors in templates   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3921] New: Compile time evaluation requirements not well-specified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3921] Compile time evaluation requirements not well-specified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3921] Compile time evaluation requirements not well-specified   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3922] New: Wrong error message with return in void function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3922] Wrong error message with return in void function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3923] New: std.algorithm.find is too much hard to understand   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3924] New: nothrow ignored in some situations   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3925] New: Missed escaping reference of a local variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3925] Missed escaping reference of a local variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3925] Missed escaping reference of a local variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3925] Missed escaping reference of a local variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3926] New: opCast(bool) in classes is bug-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1997] Better type inference for templated types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3927] New: array.length++; is an error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3835] ref foreach does not work in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3928] New: Comparing imaginaries with reals produces results that are inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3928] Comparing imaginaries with reals produces results that are inconsistent   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3826] init of fixed sized arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3408] compiler asks for object.d when it really expects object.di   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3929] New: GC.free() creates subtle bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3929] GC.free() creates subtle bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3929] Interactions between LRU array cache, memory recycling   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3929] Interactions between LRU array cache, memory recycling   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3929] Interactions between LRU array cache, memory recycling   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3930] New: AAs horribly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3930] AAs horribly broken   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3798] core.cpuid locks systems with Xeon E5530 CPU   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3931] New: Associative Arrays on repeated stress testing get progressively slower   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3932] New: Title: A forward declaration error with a struct.init   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3808] Assertion Failure : Assertion failure: 'classinfo->structsize == CLASSINFO_SIZE' on line 870 in file 'toobj.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3933] New: Array memory allocation error lacks a line number   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3933] Array memory allocation error lacks a line number   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3851] Array copy error message with no line number   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3934] New: Some untidy attributes   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3935] New: opBinary is instantiated with "="   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3935] opBinary is instantiated with "="   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3935] opBinary is instantiated with "="   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3791] Reference anonymous nested classes when describing new expressions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3936] New: Suggestions for some better alternative names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3936] Suggestions for some better alternative names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3936] Suggestions for some better alternative names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3936] Suggestions for some better alternative names   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3837] Safer number literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3937] New: os.path.dirname fails on absolute path   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3938] New: semantics of casting arrays need to be reworked   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2494] describe explicit casting of arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3939] New: Built-in __vptr attribute for classes too   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3940] New: altsep not found   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3940] altsep not found   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3940] altsep not found   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3941] New: quirks of overloading function templates impede the new operator overloading   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2609] No documentation generated for destructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3470] [tdpl]: .length should not pop up inside indexing expressions.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3942] New: dmd segfaults   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3942] dmd segfaults   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3943] New: "in" function argument is redundant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3943] "in" function argument is redundant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3943] "in" function argument is redundant   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3944] New: Require immutable annotation for new fields of class inherited from immutable class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3945] New: AssertExpression message should implicitly convert to const char[]   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3946] New: schwartzSort - SwapStrategy always unstable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3946] schwartzSort - SwapStrategy always unstable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3947] New: Implicit and explicit casting of floating point to bool produces different results   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3694] Template this parameters don't work with operator overloads   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3948] New: Array literal assign to array of different length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3948] Array literal assign to array of different length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3948] Array literal assign to array of different length   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3949] New: Wrong sized array plus pragma crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3950] New: Wrong error message in recursive template call with no !   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3950] Wrong error message in recursive template call with no !   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3950] Wrong error message in recursive template call with no !   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3950] Wrong error message in recursive template call with no !   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3950] Wrong error message in recursive template call with no !   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3950] Wrong error message in recursive template call with no !   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3951] New: [CTFE] With a fixed-size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3951] [CTFE] With a fixed-size array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3952] New: pragma(msg,...) has bugs + alternative idea   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Require 0o format for octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1730] Bogus error message calling a non-const struct method on a const struct reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3953] New: Take user to correct compiler page from digitalmars.com   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3954] New: DeclDef rule is missing TemplateMixinDeclaration   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3955] New: Very poor error message: accidentally assigning to string literal in template   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3956] New: linker removes underscore from all exported symbols of a module but the first   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3858] mixin attribute is ignored   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Remove octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Remove octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 122] DDoc newline behaviour produces suboptimal results   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3957] New: [DDOC] Wrong html with [0, 10) in the comment   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3958] New: mixin(non-static method) crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3958] mixin(non-static method) crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3958] mixin(non-static method) crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3958] mixin(non-static method) crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3959] New: can't mixin result of templated static struct method   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3960] New: Unused variable warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3960] Unused variable warning   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3961] New: [ICE] with to!   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3418] link error with cast(ulong)(ulong*real)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3418] link error with cast(ulong)(ulong*real)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2881] x.stringof returns typeof(x).stringof when x is an enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2881] x.stringof returns typeof(x).stringof when x is an enum   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1623] Overloading on different parameters numbers gratuitously restrictive.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1623] Overloading on different parameters numbers gratuitously restrictive.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1623] Overloading on different parameters numbers gratuitously restrictive.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3962] New: AssociativeArray!(K,V) .init has no [ ] operator   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3963] New: out(result) in contract programming is nan   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3963] out(result) in contract programming is nan   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3850] Signed/unsigned bytes type name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3667] Regression(D2 only): broken out(result) in contracts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 122] DDoc newline behaviour produces suboptimal results   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 124] Enhancement: Operator overloading without temporaries   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 122] DDoc newline behaviour produces suboptimal results   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3964] New: Hello World, Reloaded example on 1.0 page has writeln   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3965] New: Multiple "static this()" can be a little error-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3965] Multiple "static this()" can be a little error-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3965] Multiple "static this()" can be a little error-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3965] Multiple "static this()" can be a little error-prone   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3966] New: opUnary("++") doesn't work   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3967] New: bool opEquals() for structs instead of int opEquals()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3967] bool opEquals() for structs instead of int opEquals()   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3968] New: Some way to do certain implicit casts with operator overloading   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3969] New: Built-in compile time errors against usage of wrong operator strings   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3970] New: Problem with cast -1.0L ==> uint/ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3970] Problem with cast -1.0L ==> uint/ulong   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2513] Silent error for tupleof from forward reference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1628] Ddoc produces invalid documentation for --- blocks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1628] Ddoc produces invalid documentation for --- blocks   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 122] DDoc newline behaviour produces suboptimal results   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3857] Write property for arrays does not work properly   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3808] Assertion Failure : Assertion failure: 'classinfo->structsize == CLASSINFO_SIZE' on line 870 in file 'toobj.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3971] New: Syntax & semantics for array assigns   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3972] New: Regarding module with name different from its file name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3972] Regarding module with name different from its file name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3972] Regarding module with name different from its file name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3972] Regarding module with name different from its file name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3972] Regarding module with name different from its file name   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3973] New: out contracts fail with ref return types   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3667] Regression(D2 only): broken out(result) in contracts   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3974] New: ICE(init.c): Static array initializer with more elements than destination array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3974] ICE(init.c): Static array initializer with more elements than destination array   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3849] [missing error] Array literal length doesn't match   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3975] New: Misnamed main causes linker errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3976] New: segfault on anonymous struct/union   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3976] segfault on anonymous struct/union   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3977] New: Should disable implicit conversion of B[] to A[] when B is derived from A   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3977] Should disable implicit conversion of B[] to A[] when B is derived from A   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2095] covariance w/o typechecks = bugs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3978] New: Compiler crash on improper struct initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3978] Compiler crash on improper struct initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3978] Compiler crash on improper struct initialization   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2093] string concatenation modifies original   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1339] Invariant/const-ness is broken by built-in array properties sort and reverse   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1426] const(templated class) allows calling mutable methods   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2544] implicit const casting rules allow violations of const-safety   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3979] New: Order-of-compilation and forward reference errors   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3980] New: DMDFE confused about function pointer/whisper syntax when mixed with array indexing.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3980] DMDFE confused about function pointer/whisper syntax when mixed with array indexing.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3981] New: More useful and more clean 'is'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3981] More useful and more clean 'is'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3981] More useful and more clean 'is'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3849] [missing error] Array literal length doesn't match   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2392] Parsing ambiguity between function pointer declaration and function call   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3774] should not be able to implicitly cast to private base class   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2563] Derived class is implicitly castable to Base class when inherited privately   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1517] .sort for structs behaves badly with ref opCmp   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3982] New: [ICE] a.values on wrong AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3983] New: Regression(2.037): struct with == can't be member of struct with template opEquals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3984] New: CTFE array assignment for struct members fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3984] CTFE array assignment for struct members using a temporary slice fails   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3984] Segfault(interpret.c): CTFE using struct constructor on a local static variable   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3801] CTFE: this.arr[i] cannot be evaluated at compile time for structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3985] New: Documentation of the main() Function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3985] Documentation of the main() Function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3986] New: Struct constructors bypass default initialization of member variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3986] Struct constructors bypass default initialization of member variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3986] Struct constructors bypass default initialization of member variables   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3987] New: [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3987] [gdb] Invalid DWARF output for function pointers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1079] gdb: Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0xb705 referenced from DIE at 0x250   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3988] New: Provide canonical example for operator overloading   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3989] New: stringof of nested enums doesn't give sufficient information   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3990] New: Deferencing a dynamic array as pointer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3991] New: Void initializers in unions considered overlapping   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3994] New: Wrong line numbers inside AA/Array initializers   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3995] New: Can't access array/AA from function literal defined inside the array/AA's initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3995] Can't access array/AA from function literal defined inside the array/AA's initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3996] New: Algebraic with struct crashes compiler   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3997] New: comparing AAs doesn't work: _aaEqual missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3997] comparing AAs doesn't work: _aaEqual missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3997] comparing AAs doesn't work: _aaEqual missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3997] comparing AAs doesn't work: _aaEqual missing   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3854] Error on static initialization of arrays with trailing comma.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3998] New: BasicType2 rule shouldn't have slice syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3998] BasicType2 rule shouldn't have slice syntax   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 3999] New: Enum equality to an int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 3999] Enum equality to an int   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4000] New: Function pointer/delegate covariance   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4001] New: ctfe return value is handled incorrectly when used as template argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4001] ctfe return value is handled incorrectly when used as template argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4001] ctfe return value is handled incorrectly when used as template argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4001] ctfe return value is handled incorrectly when used as template argument   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3801] CTFE: this.arr[i] cannot be evaluated at compile time for structs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4002] New: dmd.conf and binary path in dmd -v output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4002] dmd.conf and binary path in dmd -v output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4002] dmd.conf and binary path in dmd -v output   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4003] New: The result changes only with the order of source files.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4004] New: DMD 2.042 CTFE regression with functions taking ref parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4004] DMD 2.042 CTFE regression with functions taking ref parameters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4005] New: std.c.stdlib.exit in CTFE and more   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4005] std.c.stdlib.exit in CTFE and more   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Remove octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2656] Remove octal literals   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4006] New: dirEntries won't span subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4006] dirEntries won't span subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4006] dirEntries won't span subdirectories   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4007] New: VersionSpecification not listed under DeclDef rule   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4008] New: dmd source should contain no tabs and use .cpp file extensions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4008] dmd source should contain no tabs and use .cpp file extensions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4008] dmd source should contain no tabs and use .cpp file extensions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4008] dmd source should contain no tabs and use .cpp file extensions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4009] New: OPTLINK ruins the day yet again   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4009] OPTLINK ruins the day yet again   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4009] OPTLINK ruins the day yet again   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4010] New: dmd should support linkers other than OPTLINK   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4011] New: Incorrect function overloading using mixins   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4011] Incorrect function overloading using mixins   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4012] New: [CTFE][ICE] auto template function, forward reference error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4012] [CTFE][ICE] auto template function, forward reference error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4012] [CTFE][ICE] auto template function, forward reference error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4013] New: Inconsistent codeview debug info for classes derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4013] Inconsistent codeview debug info for classes derived from IUnknown   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4014] New: CodeView debug type info not linked in from library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4014] CodeView debug type info not linked in from library   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4015] New: forward reference in alias causes error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4016] New: const initializer cannot forward reference other const initializer   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2085] CTFE fails if the function is forward referenced   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4017] New: const initializer cannot evaluate size of forward referenced alias   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1266] Cannot forward reference the typeof of the base type of a pointer whose base type is defined with typeof   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 461] Constant not understood to be constant when circular module dependency exists.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2386] Array of forward referenced struct doesn't compile   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2654] Forward reference error with array of struct and circular import   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 945] template forward reference with named nested struct only   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1055] union forward reference "overlapping initialization" error   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 102] Forward reference nested class wheel.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 102] Forward reference nested class wheel.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4018] New: Line Number not set at instatiation point   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4018] Line Number not set at instatiation point   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4018] Line Number not set at instatiation point   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2460] Ref functions can't be template functions.   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1188] Phobos doesn't correctly parse command-line arguments containing international characters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1188] Phobos doesn't correctly parse command-line arguments containing international characters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1188] Phobos doesn't correctly parse command-line arguments containing international characters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1188] Phobos doesn't correctly parse command-line arguments containing international characters   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3826] init of fixed sized arrays   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4019] New: [CTFE] Adding an item to an AA   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4020] New: [ICE][CTFE] struct postblit in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4021] New: [CTFE] AA rehash   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4022] New: [CTFE] AA get   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4023] New: std.math.hypot() returns infinity when either argument is zero   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4024] New: Last catch only accepts block statement   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3808] Assertion Failure : Assertion failure: 'classinfo->structsize == CLASSINFO_SIZE' on line 870 in file 'toobj.c'   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4025] New: Making network with the std.stdio.File interface   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4025] Making network with the std.stdio.File interface   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2059] Horrible error message   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2609] No documentation generated for destructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 2609] No documentation generated for destructor   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4026] New: Local Documentation access too slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4026] Local Documentation access too slow   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4027] New: Nested function's bug in CTFE   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4027] Closures in CTFE generate wrong code   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1079] gdb: Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0xb705 referenced from DIE at 0x250   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4028] New: delegates with differing default arguments lead to same template instantiation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4028] delegates with differing default arguments lead to same template instantiation   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 3541] Add -oq to dmd (use fully qualified module name as object filename)   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1425] Feature Request: call stack reflection   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1079] gdb: Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0xb705 referenced from DIE at 0x250   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 900] changing import order causes type mismatch   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
• [Issue 1079] gdb: Dwarf Error: Cannot find DIE at 0xb705 referenced from DIE at 0x250   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4029] New: CTFE: cannot invoke delegate returned from function   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4030] New: Better object array literal type inference   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4031] New: Tidier management of static variables in pure functions   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4032] New: std.date.makeTime has no docs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
    • [Issue 4032] std.date.makeTime has no docs   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4033] New: Error: base class is forward referenced   d-bugmail at puremagic.com
  • [Issue 4034] New: double-double functions seem to not pure-optimize   d-bugmail at puremagic.com

Last message date: Wed Mar 31 18:44:52 PDT 2010
Archived on: Wed Mar 31 18:45:10 PDT 2010

• Messages sorted by: [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...