std.experimental.logger formal review round 3
Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Nov 10 09:03:30 PST 2014
On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 11:46:34 UTC, Robert burner
Schadek wrote:
> After your last reply we haven't done anything else.
>
> I would merge his idea, but there is pushback from your side.
> Anyway, this idea would not break the api. So I don't think it
> is a blocking change, IMO.
kk, I'll try contacting him via e-mail if Martin does not return
to this thread soon enough :) This proposal may not break API
directly but it greatly affects how derivative libraries are
supposed to be designed and distributed so I'd prefer to nail it
down immediately.
There are also some more @safe changes need, I hope to provide
another branch with those soon enough (~tomorrow)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list