std.experimental.logger formal review round 3

[Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 17:03:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 11:46:34 UTC, Robert burner 
> Schadek wrote:
>> After your last reply we haven't done anything else.
>>
>> I would merge his idea, but there is pushback from your side. 
>> Anyway, this idea would not break the api. So I don't think it 
>> is a blocking change, IMO.
>
> kk, I'll try contacting him via e-mail if Martin does not 
> return to this thread soon enough :) This proposal may not 
> break API directly but it greatly affects how derivative 
> libraries are supposed to be designed and distributed so I'd 
> prefer to nail it down immediately.

I get that

>
> There are also some more @safe changes need, I hope to provide 
> another branch with those soon enough (~tomorrow)

thank you